News

 Latest News

 

Local Nursery Children Become Published Writers

Local Nursery Children Become Published Writers

 


Children from the Toybox Nursery at Deeside College are celebrating after having their work published at the ages of just 3 and 4 years old.

 

The children who are all in the Nursery’s Grasshopper room, each wrote a short poem with the help of their parents’, titled ‘My Day at ….. the Farm, the Zoo or Nursery’.  Staff from the Toybox Nursery then sent the creative masterpieces through to the organisation, ‘Young Writers’, who have used the collection in the new book, My Day At.

 

The book is now available for parents to purchase.  Along with poems from other young writers from across the UK, it features contributions from Reece Birch, Dylan Piper, Jodey Lewis Evans, Daniel Buxton, Rebecca Johnston, Finnley Clutton and Lucy Davies.

Toybox Nursery Deputy Manager, Pam Quinn said:

“It is wonderful that the children have had their work published.  We are very proud of each them.  All children in the Grasshopper room at the nursery, so those between the ages of 3 and 5 years, are encouraged to start thinking about reading and constructing stories as part of the national curriculum.  It is great to think that we have so many budding writers in this group.”

Image shows the writers, Daniel Buxton, Lucy Davies, Jody Lewis Evans, Dylan Piper and Finnley Clutton with the book and certificate confirming their entries.

 

Some families to lose £4,000 a year in 'unfair' tax credit changes

 

 Some families to lose £4,000 a year in 'unfair' tax credit changes, says Labour


Up to 200,000 low-income families will lose out from little-noticed change, says shadow chief secretary to the Treasury

Up to 200,000 families could lose £4,000 a year because of a little-noticed change to the working tax credit coming into force tomorrow says  Rachel Reeves, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury 

She will condemn the change, which will affect low-income families whose parents work between 16 and 24 hours a week, as a "deeply unfair change" that will penalise people unable to persuade their employer to let them work longer.

The change was originally announced in October 2010, but Labourbelieves that many people affected by the cut, which will save the Treasury £500m a year, have not yet grasped its implications.

Currently people on a low income can get working tax credits if they have at least one child and they are working at least 16 hours a week. But from tomorow the rules for couples will change, and one partner will have to work 24 hours a week, or both partners will have to work a total of 24 hours between them, for them to continue to qualify.

There are 212,000 families where parents work between 16 and 24 hours a week. They earn less than around £17,000 a year. According to Labour, if they do not increase their hours, they will lose £3,870 a year in tax credits.

"In this climate, very few people in part-time work will find be able to increase their hours by up to 50% at the moment," Reeves will tell members of Usdaw, the shopworkers union, in a speech at their conference. "And for a couple with children losing around £4,000 a year, or £75 a week, from this change could mean going out to work makes no sense."

The Treasury has not disputed Labour's figures, although it does not accept that the change has in any way been hidden. It was announced by George Osborne, the chancellor, as part of the spending review.

A Treasury spokesman said Labour's figures ignored some of the other government measures being introduced to help working families.

"The chancellor has confirmed that working age benefits will go up by 5.2% in April and the child element of the child tax credit will increase by inflation from April – which could mean up to £135 extra per child. We also know that families are worried about the cost of living and so we've cut fuel duty and frozen council tax. Families will also benefit from the increases in the personal tax allowance," the spokesman said.

The spokesman also stressed that the government had to save money. "Ultimately there is nothing fair about running huge budget deficits and burdening future generations with debts we cannot afford to pay," he said.

"If the deficit is not tackled now, the impact on families will be worse in the long term with less money to deliver the public services that they rely on."

"Inadequate Discipline" says Government secretary

 

Some middle class parents are turning their children into "little Buddhas" by "waiting on them hand and foot" at home, a teachers' leader has said.

Association of Teachers and Lecturers general secretary Dr Mary Bousted warned spoilt children had "disproportionate" consequences for behaviour in schools.

Parents needed to be confident in saying no to their children, she said.

It come as the union debated calls for tough behaviour sanctions in school.

The ATL conference in Manchester earlier heard that measures such as detention, suspension and exclusion, were failing to deal with behavioural issues.

But Dr Bousted laid the blame firmly with poor parenting in both poor and middle class homes.

 



 

While acknowledging most parents did a good job, she told reporters: "Children without boundaries at home resent boundaries imposed at school.

"We need to be confident in saying we can go so far but no further we need to be more confident in what we think is reasonable.

"How many parents ask their children regularly to contribute to the running of the house?

"Far too many children are waited on at home hand and foot. They don't do the washing up and they don't do the hoovering and the don't have to make their own beds.

"We are not doing them any favours if we make them into little Buddhas at home," she said.

"And it certainly doesn't do them any favours in school".

Inadequate discipline

Dr Bousted was speaking after the conference heard a resolution warning that successive governments had failed to introduce effective ways of dealing with naughty pupils since corporal punishment was abolished in 1986.

It said the forms of discipline currently available to teachers remain "totally inadequate".

In his speech to the conference, delegate Julian Perfect said he was not advocating a return to corporal punishment.

"Effective teaching and learning cannot take place against a constant background of disruptive behaviour by pupils," said Mr Perfect.

"Moreover, where such behaviour is a regular occurrence it should not be attributed to a teacher's inability to plan and take lessons.

He added: "This motion does not seek the reinstatement of corporal punishment, but rather the identification of additional forms of sanction for use by teachers to deal with inappropriate behaviour, the implementation of which will not be constrained by financial considerations or retention targets and which receive the full backing of school and college managements."

Subcategories

 

owners